HEBDEN BRIDGE WALKERS ACTION
REPORTING A PROBLEM WITH A FOOTPATH OR BRIDLEWAY
If you want to know the legal position we have included a synopsis of the law and rights of way.
If you come across a problem with a path you have two options:
Contact the rights of way section at Calderdale Council
01422 288002
Rights of Way, Town Hall,
Contact us
Three options:
You can get a report form at Mountain Wild,
Crown street, Hebden Bridge. You can fill it
in and leave it there for us to collect or take it away and post it to
CROWS (who we work with) 1 New Road, Mytholmroyd, HX7 5DZ.
Download this PDF,
print
off a copy and fill in with details of the problem. Take it to Mountain
Wild or post it to CROWS, 1 New Road, Mytholmroyd, HX7 5DZ.
Send an email to CROWS. Their email address is
crows-coop @outlook.com (to prevent spam we have inserted a space
before @, you need to remove this before you send your email).
Please include
Your name
Description of the problem
Location of the problem (as detailed as you can)
Footpath number or OS grid reference (if known)
If you have a photo of the problem, please attach it.
Follow up
CROWS
will go and inspect the problem and either fix it there and then or put
it on a schedule for a work party. They will liaise with us about
progress and there will be a report at future meetings.
Definitions
The most important fact to know about public rights of way is that they are part of the Queen’s highway and are subject to the same protection in law as a trunk road.
Orders are made by Calderdale Council or the Secretary of State for the Environment, for the creation, diversion or extinguishment of public rights of way. They usually arise through the request of the landowner. Extinguishments can be made if the local authority considers the path is no longer needed for public use. The grounds for diversion are that it is in "the interests of the owner; tenant or occupier, or of the public, and that it is not substantially less convenient to the public. The effect on public enjoyment of the path as a whole must also be considered.
The information is shown on a map to the scale of 1:2,500, or 1:10,560 and descriptions of the paths may also be given in an accompanying statement.
Management and maintenance
Footpaths, bridleways and byways are said in law to have been' dedicated’ to the use of the public by the owner of the land they cross. Very few have been formally dedicated, most being ’presumed dedicated’ because the public have used them uninterruptedly for at least 20 years. As most rights of way are ’maintainable at public expense', the surface (the top two spade depths or so) is owned by the highway authority. The highway authority is ultimately responsible for asserting and protecting the rights of the public to the use and enjoyment of paths in their area. The highway authority is Calderdale Council.
The local authority is responsible for the maintenance of any surface, such as Tarmac, gravel or chippings, overlaying the soil of the path. Ploughing and other cultivations and any farming activity that causes problems of drainage are the responsibility of the landowner.
There is a statutory right to plough any footpath or bridleway which crosses a field. Footpaths and bridleways along the edges of fields and all byways open to all traffic never have a right to be ploughed. Prosecution can be brought by a local authority against anyone who ploughs a footpath or bridleway without a right to do so.
If a footpath or bridleway crosses a field, the farmer is entitled to plough or disturb it when necessary to sow, cultivate or harvest a crop. He must then restore the surface of the path to make it reasonably convenient for walkers and riders to use, and to make sure that the line of the path is, and remains, clear on the ground. Normally this must be carried out within 24 hours of the start of the disturbance. In the case of the first disturbance for any one crop, a period of 14 days is allowed, to provide for the initial preparation of the land. Minimum widths are set for restoration. For rights of way across a field, the minimum widths are 1m for a footpath, 2m for a bridleway and 3m for byways. For field edge paths, the widths are increased to 1.5m, 3m and 5m respectively. These rules only apply for paths restored after ploughing or kept clear of crops, and do not apply generally to rights of way.
The local authority is responsible for clearing any growth, except a crop, from the surface of the path. This includes, for example, nettles or bracken which grows in the line of the path and blocks it. Any overhanging growth from trees, hedges, shrubs, nettles or other herbaceous plants adjoining the path is the responsibility of the landowner. The local authority can require the landowner to carry out this work, and if necessary can do it themselves and recover costs.
Stiles and gates on footpaths must be maintained by the landowner in a safe condition, and to a standard which does not make an unreasonable interference to the rights of users. A minimum 25% grant must be contributed by the local authority towards the cost of erection or maintenance of a stile or gate if the owner requests it. If the owner does not properly maintain the stile or gate, the highway authority can require the work to be done, or carry out the work itself and recover its costs. In practice, many authorities provide a stile or gate kit at no cost to the owner, which the owner or volunteers then install. An owner wishing to erect a stile or gate on a right of way where none existed before must apply to the highway authority for consent.
The local authority is usually responsible for the maintenance of bridges on rights of way. The landowner must provide adequate bridges where new ditches are made or existing ones widened. Bridges that cross canals or railways are maintainable by the canal owner or the railway company.
The highway authority is required to signpost all junctions of footpaths, bridleways and byways with metalled roads.
The sign must state whether the path is a footpath, bridleway or byway and may give a destination and distance.
Waymarking is marking of a path along its route. The recommended system uses yellow arrows for footpaths, blue for bridleways, and red for byways. The highway authority is required to waymark those rights of way where, in the authority’s opinion, it is necessary to help anyone unfamiliar with the locality to follow the route.
Signposts and waymarks are protected as ’traffic signs’, and it is an offence to remove or obliterate them.
Obstructions can include a barbed wire fence, a heap of manure or a standing crop. The local authority can order the landowner to remove the obstruction, or remove it themselves and recover costs. A member of the public is allowed to remove as much of an obstruction as is necessary to get past it, but must be a bona fide traveller and not have gone out with the specific aim of removing the obstruction.
It is an offence for anyone to put up a sign or notice, containing false or misleading information likely to deter people from using a public footpath or bridleway, provided the right of way is shown on the definitive map.
The highway authority is responsible for enforcing this legislation.
Bulls should not be kept in fields crossed by public rights of way unless they are under 11 months old, or are of a beef breed and accompanied by cows or heifers.
Thus, bulls of dairy breeds (Ayrshire, British Fresian, British
Holstein, Dairy Shorthorn, lersey,
It is a statutory offence to drive a vehicle along a bridleway in the absence of a private right to do so. It is not a statutory offence to ride a horse or a bicycle along a footpath, unless there is a bye-law or a traffic regulation order prohibiting that activity but a person doing so without the permission of the landowner commits a civil trespass, and the landowner can order them off, and where appropriate, sue for damages. All the rules and regulations that apply on other highways also apply on rights of way.
It is an offence to cycle on a bridleway or byway either recklessly carelessly or without consideration for other users. Vehicles used on byways must be properly taxed, registered and insured.
As public rights of way are by definition highways, they can only be used for bona fide journeys. The traveller can do anything reasonably ancillary to the journey such as pausing to look at the map, or sitting down for a rest, but any activity not directly referable to the right of passage can be an act of trespass. One example of when a landowner successfully sued for trespass was in 1900, against a journalist who walked up and down a right of way taking notes on the performance of racehorses training on the adjoining ground. Although this may seem trivial, it does underline the limit to the public’s use of a right of way. It is, as the name describes, only the right of passage.
If you enter someone else’s land without permission or right to do so, such as right of way this is trespass. There are also conditions attached to the public’s use of the land, and if you contravene these you will be trespassing.
If you do trespass, it is only in exceptional cases a criminal offence (see below), although if you cause loss or damage you can be prosecuted. lf you trespass and a landowner asks you to leave or to return to the right of way you should do so, and you must be allowed to do so freely. lf a trespasser fails to leave when asked, depending on the circumstances, reasonable force may be used to make them leave.
Under the Criminal justice and Public Order Act 1994, the offence of aggravated trespass has been created. A person may commit this offence if they trespass on land in the open air with the intention of disrupting someone else’s lawful activity Time will tell whether there are any circumstances in which genuine walkers may put themselves at risk of prosecution. It is a criminal offence to trespass on railway and Ministry of Defence land.
It is usually considered permissible for a walker to carry
as part of his right of passage, light tools such as secateurs for cutting back
odd pieces of overhanging growth. However, the carrying of any heavy tools such
as a saw might be considered evidence that the person was not a bona fide traveller,
but was out on purpose to remove an obstruction.
The removal of such an obstruction might constitute damage of
property. ·
These are not public rights of way, but footpaths or bridleways
used by the public with the permission of the landowner. They should have a
notice to that effect displayed on the path to make it clear that the owner
does not wish to dedicate the path as a right of way and the path cannot then be
presumed dedicated’ after 20 years’ use by the public. The owner can register
with the highway authority that he has no intention to dedicate. The landowner
is responsible for maintaining permitted paths.
Although such paths do not have the legal status of a right of way and are not acceptable as a substitute, they do allow access to be opened up by a simple procedure that is usually more acceptable to the landowner than a creation order, which gives the public right of way for all time.